|
1999 Fellowship
Programme
1999 Conference Programme
Media power
and responsibility: the role of the fourth estate in the 21st century
Study
Tour of the Baltic States and St Petersburg: a post-imperial renaissance?
The
Future of the Nation State
Globalization:
Challenges and Discontents
Media power and responsibility:
the role of the fourth estate in the 21st century
Download Michael Ignatieff's
Introductory Paper
or
Download his Report and see how his
opinions changed
- St Edmund Hall, Oxford
- March 19-27, 1999
Senior Fellow
| Michael Ignatieff |
Author and Broadcaster |
Speakers
| What has been the
impact of industrial concentration in the media? Does
it require tighter or looser regulation? |
| Duncan Lewis |
Managing Director, Equant N.V. |
| Mathew Horsman |
Henderson Crosthwaite |
| Where are new technologies
taking us? (I) |
| Dr David Levy |
Head of European Policy, BBC |
| Where are new technologies
taking us? (II) |
| Ian Stewart |
Chairman, AZTEC Internet Limited |
| Media Power: Deconstructing
from Within (After Dark - a TV case study) |
| Sebastian Cody |
Open Media |
| The journalistic mind |
| Professor Kenneth Minogue |
London School of Economics |
| How is journalism changing
as a profession? For better or for worse? |
| Chris Elliott |
Executive Editor, The Guardian |
| Information in crises,
conflicts and complex emergencies: who really commands
the high ground? |
| Nik Gowing |
BBC World |
| The collapse of grand
narrative (1) - without the Cold War can interest be
sustained in foreign news? Does it matter? |
| Juan-Carlos Gumucio |
El Pais |
| Media and society -
changing perceptions of authority, community and privacy |
| Michael Ignatieff |
Senior Fellow |
| Anthony Smith |
President, Magdalen College, Oxford |
| The collapse of grand
narrative (2) - with the blurring of left and right
must domestic news focus increasingly on personalities and
populist causes at the expense of policy debate? |
| Ian Hargreaves |
Cardiff School of Journalism and Chairman of
the think-tank Demos |
| How far can spin doctors
determine public reaction to events? |
| Philip Gould |
Political and Public Affairs Strategist |
| The media as defender of
democracy |
| Mohamed Sid Ahmed |
Al Ahram Centre for Strategic Studies, Cairo |
| Panel discussion on the
media's role in democracy |
| Chandrika Kaul |
Nuffield College, Oxford |
| Christina Stucky |
The Sunday Independent, Johannesburg |
| Maja Zafirovska |
Macedonian Television |
Advertised Synopsis
Industrial concentration and new technologies have revolutionised
the media, and that revolution is set to continue. For some, the consequences
have been wholly positive: an explosion of information, greatly increased
access to it, and a significant expansion of choice for the
consumer and the surfer of the web. For others, the results have
been a "dumbing down", the over-stretching of resources, a de-skilling
of journalists and a distortion of the information on which citizens
depend to understand the world around them. Where does the balance
lie? How far are these changes in the media affecting our
attitude to authority, the right to privacy and the way communities
see themselves? Recent changes in "the message" have had their own
revolutionary effect: we have seen the collapse of a grand narrative
- the links between stories - since the end of the Cold War and the
blurring of differences between left and right. Is it only
the proliferation of corpses that can attract attention to foreign
affairs and politicians' private lives that make the best domestic
headlines? But how far does experience differ from country to country,
with the media still recognised in some as the chief bastion
against tyranny while in others there is undue complacency about
the freedom of the press? How can we ensure that the media serves
democracy well into the 21st century?
Back to Top
Study Tour of the Baltic
States and St Petersburg: a post-imperial renaissance?
Download Tour Report
- Vilnius, Riga, Tallinn, Lahemaa National Park,
Narva, St Petersburg
- 16-30 May 1999
Tour Leader
| Sir Michael Weir |
Director, 21st Century Trust |
Speakers
| The first years of
Lithuanian independence: achievements and aspirations |
| Dr Algirdas Brazauskas |
Former President of Lithuania,Chairman of the
Algirdas Brazauskas Fund |
| Lithuania's security and
relations with its neighbours |
| Rimantas Remeika |
Faculty of Philology, Vilnius University |
| The workings of a new
democracy |
| Dr Raimundas Lopata |
Director, Institute of International
Relations and Political Science, Vilnius University |
| Scenarios for Lithuania's
development in the 21st Century |
| HE Christopher Robbins |
British Ambassador to Lithuania |
| Looking West and East:
Lithuanian foreign policy and relations with the European
Union and NATO |
| Algimantas Rimkunas |
Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs |
| Audrius Bruzga |
Deputy Political Director, Head of Western
European Section, Ministry of Foreign Affairs |
| Catching up: economic
reform in Lithuania |
| Dr Elena Leontjeva |
Free Market Institute |
| Professor Eduardo Vilkas |
Director, Institute of Economics, Vilnius |
| The role of the media in
building democracy |
| Pauls Rudseps |
Managing Editor, Diena newspaper,
Riga |
| Modernising the economy |
| Dimitri Demekas |
IMF Representative in Latvia and Estonia |
| A comparative survey of the
three Baltic States |
| Ian Stewart |
Director of the British Council, Baltic
States |
| Citizenship, ethnic
minorities and social integration |
| David Johnson |
Head of OSCE Mission in Riga |
| The development of Estonian
democracy |
| Andres Tarrand |
Chairman, Parliamentary Foreign Affairs
Committee, Estonia |
| Estonia's Foreign Economic
Relations |
| Madis Rausi |
Marketing Director of Estonian Investment
Agency |
| Transforming the Estonian
economy |
| Mart Relve |
Director-General, Estonian Chamber of
Commerce and Industry |
| Partnership for peace?
Russia's security concerns and scenarios for the future |
| Professor Konstantin Khudolei |
Dean of the International Relations Faculty,
University of St Petersburg |
| Getting the economy right:
policies and prospects |
| Dmitry Pankin |
General Director, St Petersburg Bank of
Reconstruction and Development |
| Liberal democracy in St
Petersburg and in comparison with the rest of Russia:
how well developed is it and what are the challenges it faces?
|
| Brian Whitmore |
St Petersburg Times |
| Human rights issues and the
work of Grazdanski Kontrol' |
| Boris Pustintsev |
Grazdanski Kontrol' (Citizens' Watch) |
| Perspektiven:
the work of a charity for street children in St
Petersburg |
| Margarete von der Borch |
Chair of Perspektiven |
| Cultural tour of St
Petersburg |
| Dr Alexey Leporc |
Art Historian |
Advertised Synopsis
The Baltic States and St Petersburg region, one of great
natural beauty and architectural distinction, has in the past decade
seen changes as quietly revolutionary as in any part of the former
Soviet Union. The Baltic States have accomplished a major transformation
of their social, political, and economic circumstances without recourse
to violence, while St Petersburg has re-discovered its historic
role as Russia's alternative capital with its own interests. This
tour will study both the recent past and future challenges, looking
at inter alia the strategies used to overcome the grim legacy
of Soviet rule; the ethnic divisions within the region; and current
pressures for a special relationship with the EU and NATO.
We will seek to identify the particular characteristics of each
state as well as those they have in common, visiting not only their
handsome capital cities but provincial and rural areas. We will have
meetings with prominent figures in politics, government, business,
and the academic world, and also have time for sight-seeing
and relaxation - with the benefit of the midnight sun. This trip
offers a rare opportunity to learn more about a region and its cultures
which have historic associations with the West but remained closed
to outside view for over half a century.
Back to Top
The Future of the Nation
State
Download Robert Cooper's
Introductory Paper
- Klingenthal Castle, near Strasbourg
- 18-26 June 1999
Senior Fellow
| Robert Cooper |
Foreign Office, London; author of The Post-Modern
State and the World Order |
Speakers
| What are the
historical roots of the nation state? How deep do they run? |
| Dr Christopher Coker |
Reader in International Relations, London
School of Economic |
| What is the state for? |
| Geoff Mulgan |
Policy Unit, Office of the British Prime
Minister |
| Multilateral security and
intervention by the international community: where
does that leave sovereignty? |
| Rosemary Righter |
Chief Leader Writer, The Times,
London |
| To what extent is
globalization transforming what the state can do? |
| Professor Bertrand Badie |
Professor of Political Science, Institut d'Etudes
Politiques, Paris |
| How far can or should
international institutions limit the role of the nation
state? |
| Gilles Andréani |
Former Director, Centre d'Analyse et de
Prevision, Quai d'Orsay, now Senior Fellow International
Institute for Strategic Studies, London |
| What impact will the
economic and military might of the United States have
on the future of the nation state? |
| Flora Lewis |
Columnist, the International Herald
Tribune |
| Do post-colonial nation
states show up the limitations of the Western model? |
| Lakhdar Brahimi |
Special Representative of the Secretary-General
of the United Nations, Former Foreign Minister of
Algeria |
| The Nature of the African
State |
| Professor Patrick Chabal |
Professor of Lusophone African Studies, King's
College, London |
Advertised Synopsis
For over three centuries world order has been maintained
by the nation state, partly through its internal laws and external
treaties and partly by conquest. In today's world of some 180 states,
this picture seems to be changing. As well as treaties we have treaty
organisations: the OSCE and the WTO alongside the older
NATO and OECD. Above all, under the Treaty of Rome, we have EU institutions
making laws with direct application in member states, and (sometimes)
giving orders to governments. Below the state level there is an increasing
trend towards devolution of power. France has been decentralised;
the Spanish regions have extensive powers; the German länder
are resisting the transfer of power to either Bonn or Brussels. In
the UK Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales are all about to acquire
devolved power. Thirdly, the power and influence of non-governmental
bodies are growing. Many of these operate across national
boundaries. In the early post-war years there was concern about
transnational corporations. These are if anything a a greater force
today. Nor can states ignore bodies such as Greenpeace and Amnesty
International and international news media such as CNN. Where does
that leave the nation state? Is it, as the popular saying goes, too
big for small problems and too small for big problems? But if
this is the case can we really imagine a world, or a Europe, without
states or without nations?
Back to Top
Globalization: Challenges
and Discontents
Download Dominique
Moïsi's Introductory Paper
or
Download excerpts from his Report
- Al Akhawayn University, Ifrane, Morocco
- 10-17 September 1999
Senior Fellow
| Dominique Moïsi |
Deputy Director, Institut Français des
Relations Internationales, Paris |
Speakers
| The View from Morocco |
| Professor Rachid Benmokhtar
Benabdellah |
President, Al Akhawayn University |
| Global telecommunications,
the Internet, and centres of power |
| Duncan Lewis |
Managing Director, Equant N.V. |
| Economics: are national
borders becoming redundant? |
| Richard O'Brien |
GBN, London |
| Global Corporations and
Development: Nation Builders or Nation Wreckers? |
| Dr Noreena Hertz |
The Judge Institute of Management Studies,
Cambridge |
| The management of the
global economy |
| John Sewell |
Overseas Development Council, Washington DC |
| Culture:
is Globalization really Americanization? |
| Lord David Puttnam |
Film Producer; Chairman, National Endowment
for Science, Technology and the Arts |
| Doing business in a global
marketplace: intellectual property as a case study |
| Dr Harriet Strimpel |
Bromberg & Sunstein, Boston |
| Globalization: to whose
benefit? The West or the world as a whole? |
| Professor Remy Leveau |
CERI, Paris |
Advertised Synopsis
What is the real significance of globalization? In nearly
all public debate it is regarded as a given, frequently in an
unexamined or clichéd way. It has been seen as an unstoppable
economic process, radically constraining government policies and
transforming societies. Proponents applaud this, pointing to the
growth and development resulting from liberalisation in trade -
particularly in capital flows - and the dynamism of transnational
corporations. The technological revolution, principally in communications,
makes this a new and enduring phenomenon, they argue, despite any
temporary setbacks. Critics, however, point to the concomitant
global costs in environmental degradation, crime and terrorism,
and to the social groups and low income countries suffering unemployment
or exploitation as a consequence of relentless market forces. They
have foreseen a cultural backlash against the homogenizing
values of Western style capitalism, and perhaps the resurgence
of protectionism and nationalism. This debate has been brought into
sharp focus by the economic crisis in the Asia Pacific region and
Russia. What are the long term consequences of the crisis likely
to be? As the Bretton Woods institutions come to look ever more dated,
what measure of management or regulation of the world economy
is desirable and what is practicable? How are the economic crisis
and more fundamental changes going to affect international relations
and governments? What will be the enduring importance of globalization
and its discontents
Back to Top
1999
Fellowship Programme
The Environmental Debate: "Spinning
the Truth"
(In Conjunction with the St. Catharine's Foundation)
- Cumberland Lodge
- 17-19 February 1999
Senior Fellows
| Andy Oliver |
Head, Health Safety and Environmental Unit,
Shell International |
| Richard Sandbrook |
Director, International Institute for the
Environment and Development |
Speakers
| Issues and Dilemmas |
| Andy Oliver |
Head, Health Safety and Environmental Unit,
Shell International |
| Richard Sandbrook |
Director, International Institute for the
Environment and Development |
| What is Objective Truth? |
| John Vidal |
Journalist, The Guardian |
| Richard North |
Freelance Journalist |
| Of Genes and Oil –
Business and Sustainable Development |
| Chris Gibson-Smith |
Managing Director, British Petroleum |
| Colin Merritt |
Technical Manager for Biotechnology, Monsanto |
| The Role of NGOs in
Motivating Change |
| Robin Grove-White |
Director, Centre for the Study of Environmental
Change, Lancaster University |
| Kirsty Hamilton |
Greenpeace International |
| Charles Secrett |
Executive Director, Friends of the Earth |
| Use and Abuse of Science in
the Environmental Debate |
| Sir Robert May |
Chief Scientific Adviser to the UK Government
and Head of Office of Science and Technology |
| Does Spin Affect Public
Policy? |
| The Rt Hon John Gummer |
Member of Parliament and former Secretary of
State for the Environment |
| The Constraints of the
Media |
| Simon Campbell-Jones |
Producer of "Scare Stories", BBC Television |
Advertised Synopsis
Assessing the long-term impact on the environment of current
industrial and agricultural practices is highly complex, and clear-cut
scientific predictions are often impossible. There are also difficult
trade-offs between environmental and economic interests, even when
"sustainable development" is a declared common goal. The issues
are inevitably simplified in debate and this conference will
consider how far the public perception of environmental threats is
shaped - or distorted - by the agendas of environmental movements,
businesses, governments and the media, and in turn how those agendas
are influenced by public reactions. The international dimension
of the debate and of public policy will also be examined. To what
extent is the public being badly informed with regard to environmental
issues? In what ways might the standards of truth be raised?
The Reconstruction
of Berlin and its new role in Germany and an EU expanding eastwards
- Deutsche Bank Berlin Branch
Headquarters
- 12-14 November 1999
Chair
| Dr Hermann Freiherr von
Richthofen |
Former Ambassador of Germany to NATO and to
the United Kingdom |
Speakers
| The cultural and
architectural significance of the reconstruction of Berlin |
| Dr Hans Stimmann |
State Secretary, Berlin Senat |
| Berlin - Centre or
Periphery? |
| Prof Dr Hagen Schulze |
Free University of Berlin |
| Berlin's new role in an EU
enlarging eastwards |
| Thomas Kielinger |
Die Welt |
| Gerd Wartenberg |
State Secretary, Berlin Senat |
| Scenarios for the economic
future of Berlin |
| Frederick Stüdemann |
Berlin Bureau, Financial Times |
| Berlin and its minorities |
| Barbara John |
Berlin Senat |
| The new image of Berlin |
| Volker Hassemer |
'Partner für Berlin' |
Advertised Synopsis
Following closely upon the tenth anniversary of the Fall
of the Berlin Wall, this will be an opportunity to explore the
reconstruction of Berlin and its renewed status as the capital of
Germany. The weekend will include a tour of some of the main architectural
projects, and guest speakers will lead discussions about how the
city is coming to terms with its past and fashioning its
future role in Germany's politics, economy and culture as well as
in a European Union enlarging eastwards. By kind invitation of Deutsche
Bank AG the seminar will be held at their Berlin Branch on Unter
den Linden; the building also houses the Berlin Guggenheim Museum
which we will visit.
Back to Top
Summary of all Conferences
|