|
2001 Fellowship
Programme
2001 Conference Programme
1. Rethinking
Security for the 21st Century
2.
The Economic, Political and Social Implications of the Internet:
just how radical will they be?
3.
Human Rights as Collective Rights:
benefits and pitfalls
1. Rethinking Security
for the 21st Century
Download Dr Coker's
Introductory Paper
Senior Fellow
| Dr Christopher Coker |
London School of Economics |
Speakers
| Peace, security and
the UN in the future |
| Ambassador Lakhdar Brahimi |
Special Representative of the UN Secretary
General |
| Globalization and the
changing structure of international relations |
| Professor Zaki Laïdi |
CERI, Paris |
| Constraints and opportunities
for the military in future wars |
| William Doll |
Joint Warfare Analysis Center |
| Cyber-war and cyber-terrorism |
| Dr Paul Kielstra |
21st Century Trust |
| The risk society and the
assessment of threat |
| Dr Ragnar Lofstedt |
University of Surrey |
| Transnational crime: case
studies |
| The Mediterranean |
| Dr Claire Spencer |
Centre for Defence Studies, King's College
London |
| The Caribbean |
| Yolande Forde |
Consultant criminologist, Barbados |
| South Africa |
| Dr Pingla Udit |
Special Advisor, Office of the National
Director of Public Prosecutions |
| Permeable borders |
| i. Evironmental risks |
| Dr Alan Dupont |
Australian National University |
| ii. Disease |
| Julian Lambert |
UK Department for International Development |
| Privatization of security |
| Jed Snyder |
Senior National Security Advisor, Dyn
Meridian Corporation, USA |
| The security agendas
characteristic of post-modern states |
| Robert Cooper |
Foreign Policy Adviser, 10 Downing Street |
Advertised Synopsis
The end of the Cold War encouraged us to think we would
feel more secure. Instead developed societies in particular feel
even less secure than ever. Rather than the threat of nuclear war
we face a variety of risks, some environmental, others social, all
potentially demoralising. Our sense of insecurity is now determined
by a range of different issues: migration; disease (especially
AIDS); environmental pollution and crime. War itself is now
less and less immediate in our imagination. What has happened? Why
are we less fearful but more anxious than ever? This conference will
look at the changing security agenda and the dynamics of insecurity
which has emerged since the end of the Cold War: the result of
globalisation and the emergence of risk societies. It will focus
on individual challenges such as crime and disease in the context
of security thinking. It will require us to ask to what extent transnationalism
is forcing us to rethink security. And it will ask what strategies
are best suited to make people feel more secure in the future, whether
universal, regional, or local, government or private. Should we be
managing insecurity, containing challenges or going further and
trying to resolve problems with the confidence sometimes shown
in the past?
Back to Top
2. The Economic, Political
and Social Implications of the Internet:
just how radical will they be?
Download John Naughton's
Introductory Paper
Speakers
| What is really new in
the New Economy and what will endure? |
| Professor Hal Varian |
University of California at Berkeley |
| The Net and Freedom |
| Tom Gibson |
Managing Partner, Kirkwood/Gibson Consultants |
| What long term changes
await business and consumers? |
| Professor Jim Norton |
Institute of Directors, London |
| Shaping the future of the
Internet: Economics vs. Technology |
| Dr David Clark |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| The Internet, governance
and government |
| Esther Dyson |
Chairman, EDventure Holdings, former Founding
Chairman of ICANN |
| Politics and the Internet |
| Doug Hattaway |
Chief spokesperson for Al Gore 2000
Presidential campaign |
| E-government |
| Daniel Stedman-Jones |
Demos, London |
| E-democracy |
| Monique van Dusseldorp |
van Dusseldorp & partners, Amsterdam |
| The digital divide: what it
means, and how it can be addressed |
| Professor Ernest Wilson |
Dept. of Government and Politics, University
of Maryland |
| Case study: Internet radio |
| Santoso |
Radio 68H, Indonesia |
| Society on-line: can the
Internet provide new forms of community or new democratic
structures? |
| Professor Lee Sproull |
New York University |
| Case Study: njserves.org |
| Professor Michael Shafer |
Rutgers University |
| Innovation and the Internet |
| Professor Lawrence Lessig |
Stanford Law School, Stanford University |
Advertised Synopsis
The Internet, together with new communications technologies
and a precipitous decline in the cost of data transfer look set to
transform the infrastructure of the 21st century world. Businesses,
governments, NGOs and other organizations are being compelled to transform
how they operate and relate to one another, while individual
societies and the world in general have to face the danger of
'digital divides' exacerbating existing inequalities. A grasp of
the attendant economic, political, social, and cultural implications
of these developments is vital for the formation of policy in this
area. This conference will consider aspects of the communications
revolution, including: how communications technology is likely to
evolve in the near future; how it is affecting and will affect the
way humans interact, and the impact this might have on society (both
domestic and international); the changes the Internet is bringing
to how we shop, do business, and invest, including the implications
of e-business for traditional economies and governmental structures,
as well as claims of a new economic paradigm; how the role of NGOs
might develop in the face of these innovations; how technological
changes might alter the way societies govern themselves, either
in more democratic or more authoritarian ways; the extent to
which the Internet should or even can be regulated - and by whom -
and the implications for free speech and libel laws; how the technology
will transform public education and learning; the danger of the evolution
of an information underclass on domestic as well as international
scales; and the challenges and opportunities which a wired world will
pose to national security. To promote original ideas in this area,
the conference will examine these questions as part of a scenario building exercise, designed to
encourage an integrated consideration of the disparate strands of
the issue at hand and to generate outlines of a series of possible
futures which might - without engaging in prediction - illuminate
the opportunities and dangers ahead. This conference is being
held with generous sponsorship from Equant/Global
One.
Back to Top
3. Human Rights as Collective
Rights:
benefits and pitfalls
Download Neal Ascherson's
Introductory Paper
Senior Fellow
| Neal Ascherson |
Journalist and Author |
Speakers
| Minority Rights Amidst
Conflict |
| Professor Andrew Michels |
DePaul University College of Law, Chicago |
| Collective rights and their
dilemmas: which rights for which groups |
| Professor Will Kymlicka |
Queen's University, Kingston |
| Case study: the Roma |
| Dr Michael Stewart |
University College London |
| Minorities and participatory
democracy |
| Maleiha Malik |
King's College London |
| Is unequal treatment of
groups ever fair? |
| Professor Brian Barry |
Columbia University |
| Case study: Inuit ideas of
ownership |
| Hugh Brody |
Anthropologist and Film-maker |
| Self-determination and its
limits: inherent right, threat to peace, or both? |
| Edward Mortimer |
Director of Communications, Office of the UN
Secretary-General, New York |
| Case study: collective
rights in the South Tyrol |
| Dr Jens Woelk |
University of Trento |
| Righting historical wrongs
and the claims culture |
| Ian Buruma |
Author and formerly Fellow of the Woodrow
Wilson Institute for the Humanities, Washington DC |
| Chidi Odinkalu |
Senior Legal Officer, Interights |
Advertised Synopsis
Human rights considerations play a central role not only in domestic
constitutional arrangements, their long-established home, but also
more and more in international affairs. A thornier question is
what rights can be said to reside in a collective or group -
be it ethnic, linguistic or religious. The international community
does recognize such collective rights to a limited degree. Self-determination
is inherent in a people, not in individuals, and, under the
Genocide Convention, states are bound to intervene in other states'
affairs because of an attack on an identifiable group in a way which
more indiscriminate mass slaughter alone does not compel. This conference
will examine some of the difficulties inherent in the question
of collective rights, with particular consideration of the place of
minorities in national political arrangements and in international
affairs, including: How far do such rights go, or are even self-determination
and genocide concepts too fraught with difficulty to be
used except as justifications? What sorts of groups can make a claim
to this kind of right? How can a group with a claim to collective
identity and rights assert itself and have its assertion recognized?
How can such rights be exercised and who can claim to speak on behalf
of a group especially where traditional power structures are not
democratic? How can the exercise of collective rights be
reconciled with the rights of other groups, or to individual rights
both within and without the collective, when there is a clash?
Back to Top
Summary of all Conferences
2001
Fellowship Programme
Go to 2001 Conference
Programme
1. Orientalism
Today
2.Relations
Between the United States and Europe: Future Prospects
Orientalism
Today
- Hotel Richmond, Istanbul
- 5-7 October 2001
Speakers
| Orientalism and its enemies
in the late 20th century |
| Sir Michael Weir |
British Ambassador to Egypt 1979-1985, and
Director of the 21st Century Trust 1990-2000 |
| Will new communication
technologies make a difference? |
| Metehan Sekban |
Coordinator of the MBA Programme, Bilgi
University |
| Transnationalised eyes and
the importance of film: new perspectives in contemporary
cinema |
| Professor Deniz Derman |
Bahcesehir University, Istanbul |
| Case study: the impact of
cultural assumptions at home and abroad on Turkey's
role in the international community |
| Professor Hüseyin Bagci |
Middle East Technical University, Ankara |
Brief Description
Istanbul stands at the crossroads between Europe and Asia.
It is an ideal place to consider how people from different cultural
backgrounds view each other and how those views affect international
relations. Looking at film and the press, what in particular is the
role of the media in this? How might cross-cultural views be affected
by new communications technologies? How might Turkey specifically
be affected by cultural assumptions at home and abroad, given its
key strategic role in the Middle East and Central Asia, as a member
of Nato and as an aspirant member of the European Union?
Back to Top
Back to Fellowhsip Programme
Relations
Between the United States and Europe: Future Prospects
- Scotland House, Rond Point Schuman,
Brussels
- 16-17 November 2001
Speakers
| The longer view: possible
points of tension in the alliance and how they might
be resolved |
| Guillaume Parmentier |
Institut Français des Relations
Internationales, Paris |
| The view from NATO |
| Lord Robertson |
Secretary General of Nato |
| The evolution of the
transatlantic alliance |
| Dr Alice Ackermann |
The George C. Marshall European Center for
Security Studies, Garmisch-Partenkirchen |
| The view from the European
Union |
| The Rt Hon Chris Patten |
European Commissioner for External Affairs,
Chairman 21st Century Trust |
| Economics and the
environment: where do US interests converge with Europe,
where do they differ? |
| Dr David Victor |
Council on Foreign Relations, New York |
| Political cultures and
world views: how wide is the Atlantic? |
| Nicole Renvert |
Director Transatlantic Project, Bertelsmann
Stiftung, Gütersloh |
| Dr Robert McGeehan |
Institute of United States Studies,
University of London |
| Views of the Middle East
and the War on Terrorism |
| Sir Michael Weir |
British Ambassador to Egypt 1979-1985, and
Director of the 21st Century Trust 1990-2000 |
| Maj. Douglas McNary |
Senior Analyst, Emergent Information
Technologies, Washington DC, Major in US Air Force Reserve |
Brief Description
Relations between Europe and the United States seems as
strong as ever, but face a number of difficult challenges, particularly
in the fields of security and economics. Nato has not only survived
the end of the Cold War, confounding some commentators, but has expanded
and been more active militarily than ever before in its intervention
in the Balkans. However, there are possible strains in the alliance
as the United States, with the advent of a new administration, debates
its own national interest and looks to protect it with a missile defence
system. Some European allies fear that this will leave them
out in the cold and destabilize arms control. Political integration
in Europe, on the other hand, is starting to take on a military dimension
with plans for a rapid reaction force. This might operate neatly
within Nato structures or might, as some critics fear and some
supporters wish, outgrow Nato as the European Union becomes
more assertive on security matters. In their economic relations,
the US and the EU have generally worked together within the WTO and
the Bretton Woods institutions to resolve disputes and to manage
globalization and its attendant squalls. However, disputes
over issues such as intellectual property and trade in bananas have
at times been bitter, and may presage further tensions as the political
balance and economic conditions change. This seminar will examine
what shape the transatlantic alliance is in and discuss
the different possible directions it may take in the future.
Back to Top
Back to Fellowhsip Programme
|