|
2003 Fellowship
Programme
2003 Conference Programme
1. Global
Civil Society: expectations, capacities, and the accountability
of international NGOs
2.
The Future of Higher Education: dilemmas and opportunities
3.
History, Policy, and Identity
1. Global civil society:
expectations, capacities and the accountability of international NGOs
Dr Michael Williams' Introductory Paper
Senior Fellow
| Dr
Michael Williams |
Special Adviser
to the UK Foreign Secretary; formerly with the UN and with Amnesty
International |
Speakers
The
exponential growth of international NGOs and expectations of
them
|
| Michael
Edwards |
Ford Foundation |
| Globalization
and new technologies: how will the structure of NGOs change? |
| Dr
Helmut Anheier |
London School
of Economics |
| General
case study: Environmental NGOs |
| Richard
Sandbrook |
Co-founder of
Friends of the Earth, until recently Director of International
Institute for Environment and Development |
| Will
NGOs increasingly become sub-contractors of governments,
corporations or the UN? |
| Dr
Helmut Anheier |
London School
of Economics |
| General
case study: the Save the Children Fund |
| Mike
Aaronson |
Secretary-General,
Save the Children Fund UK |
| NGOs,
politics and the media |
| John
Clark |
Operations Policy
Group, World Bank |
| Is
humanitarianism fatally flawed? |
| David
Rieff |
Author |
| Sleeping
with the enemy: NGOs and combatants in conflict zones |
| Dr
Michael Williams |
Senior Fellow |
| Case
study: NGOs in the Great Lakes Region in the 1990s |
| Linda
Melvern |
Investigative
journalist and Honorary Fellow, University of Wales at Aberystwyth
|
| NGOs,
accountability and self-regulation |
| Alex
Jacobs |
Mango |
| General
case study: Amnesty International |
| Irene
Khan |
Secretary-General,
Amnesty International |
| Northern
NGOs and the South: partnership or patronage? |
| Dennis
McNamara |
Inspector General,
UNHCR |
Advertised Synopsis
The rise of NGOs both international
and national was a marked feature of the closing decades of
the 20th century. Especially following the collapse of the Soviet
system, much faith was placed in a renewal of civil society and the
capacity of voluntary associations to express aspirations and deliver
services more creatively and responsively than governments. This conference
will examine how far NGOs have met these expectations and how they might
develop in the future. The different types of NGOs will be assessed
alongside their changing relationships, both co-operative and antagonistic,
with governments, inter-governmental organisations and corporations.
How far are NGOs leaving governments behind in responding to the challenges
posed by globalization, in terms of their flexibility and a growing
sense - nurtured by ever more sophisticated communications technologies
- of international responsibility for issues such as the environment,
sustainable development and human rights? Conversely, how far are some
NGOs encroaching on the proper sphere of democratically elected governments,
or, as a result of their proliferation or zeal, thwarting the co-ordination
necessary in an emergency or a conflict zone? What is the impact of
NGOs on international business practices? How far might NGOs themselves
need to become more business-like in their operations? How do funding
concerns shape an NGOs mission? How can the creative potential of
NGOs, and their accountability, be best maximized?
Back to Top
2. The Future
of Higher Education:
dilemmas and opportunities
(in collaboration with Cumberland
Lodge)
Baroness Warwick's
Introductory Paper
Senior Fellow
| Baroness
Warwick |
Chief Executive,
Universities UK |
Speakers
| How
should universities respond to the challenges posed by globalization,
economic change,and developments in the workplace? (I) |
| Prof
Peter Scott |
Vice-Chancellor,
Kingston University |
| The
impact of new technologies and distance learning |
| Dr
Robin Middlehurst |
University of
Surrey |
| Creative
diversity, the aim to be world class, equality of provision: where
are the trade-offs? |
| Dr
Aglaja Frodl |
German Academic
Exchange Service, London |
Lord
Claus Moser
|
Chancellor of Keele University,
formerly Warden of Wadham College, Oxford
|
| Extending
access to higher education: how far, and in what ways, should this
be made a priority? |
| Professor
Nicholas Barr |
London School
of Economics |
| Higher
education and societies in transition: Moldova |
| Prof
Valentina Teosa |
Moldova State
University |
| How
should universities respond to the challenges posed by globalization,
economic change,and developments in the workplace? (II) |
| Dr
Andrew Adonis |
Head of the Policy
Unit, 10 Downing Street |
| Democratic
accountability and academic freedom: what is the proper extent of,
and what should be the limits to, government intervention in higher
education? |
| Prof
Kenneth Minogue |
London School of Economics |
| Hon.
Nahas Angula |
Minister of Higher
Education, Namibia |
| Do
private and corporate universities, and/or corporate involvement
in public universities, offer the best hope for maximizing innovation
and funding in higher education? |
| Dr
Joseph Duffey |
Senior Vice-President,
Sylvan Learning Systems and formerly Asst. U.S. Secretary of State
for Educational and Cultural Affairs |
| Research
and teaching: how should the balance be struck? |
| Jonathan
Rée |
Author and philosopher |
Barbara Kehm
|
University of Halle
|
| Higher
education and sustainable development |
| Sara
Parkin |
Forum for the Future,
London |
| Utility
and values: what are universities for? |
| Dr
Onora O’Neill |
Principal of Newnham
College, Cambridge |
Advertised Synopsis
Research, innovation, scholarship,
international competitiveness, as well as the underpinnings
of a prosperous society populated by intelligent well-informed
citizens: the university is expected to deliver all of
these. Can it? Or are these demands driving higher education
in many places into crisis? This conference will examine some
of the tensions, real or apparent, which this sector experiences
around the world, and which affect the very nature of the university
in individual countries. These dilemmas include the debate over
broadening access as against the quality of teaching for
a select group of students; the distribution of academic
resources, or even entire institutions, between research and teaching;
the search to be bodies of global importance while also serving
national or local needs; the problem of differentiation between
universities in a given country while maintaining some notion
of equality; the difficulty of maintaining academic freedom in the
face of even well-disposed governments seeking to advance
policy objectives through higher education; the assessment
of the best mix of public and private institutions (the latter
running from traditional universities to those run by corporations)
for a country; and questions relating to resources allocation
between science, technology, and the humanities. Underlying all
of these quandaries are the vexed questions of funding,
of what knowledge will be important in future, of the best way
to teach it, and of what students and employers expect of the university.
Technological innovation increases uncertainty on the latter scores.
In particular, how will it impact on the work place for
which universities prepare so many, and how will it change the nature
of teaching itself. On the other hand, what place remains for the
ideal of the rounded, critical thinker, traditionally common to
both the humanities and the sciences, when universities are under
such pressure to provide those with the training to cope with our
complex, technological world. Is the university an institution
or an idea?
Back to Top
3. History,
Policy, and Identity
(in collaboration
with British Council Seminars)
Neal Ascherson's
Introductory Paper
Senior Fellow
| Neal Ascherson |
Author and Journalist |
Speakers
| Readings and
mis-readings of history: the making of group identities |
| Professor Norman
Stone |
Middle East Technical University |
| Case study I:
History in schools and the media: changing national identities in the
UK |
| Professor Rob Phillips |
Institute of Education, Manchester
Metropolitan University |
| Case Study II:
Between Eurasia-centrism and Ethno-centrism: history textbooks in post-Communist
Russia |
| Dr Victor Shnirelman |
Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology,
Moscow |
| Case Study III:
Ireland and its different histories |
| Professor Brian
Walker |
Institute of Irish Studies, Queen's
University Belfast |
| Controlling
recent history: a video archive and the Milosevic regime |
| Dr Snjezana Milivojevic |
Faculty of Political Science, Belgrade
University |
| History and
the roots of conflict: the former Yugoslavia |
| Tim Judah |
Author of The Serbs and Kosovo:
War and Revenge |
| TV and perceptions
of the past |
| Paul Mitchell |
Wilton Films |
| Aborigines,
interpretations of history and land claims |
| Eric Angel |
Public History, Winnipeg |
| Should there
be laws against Holocaust denial? |
| Neal Ascherson |
Senior Fellow |
| The significance
of truth-telling after conflict |
| Gugulethu Nxumalo
|
Chief Director for Special Programmes,
South African Department of Education |
| Chairman Mao's
Red Guard Movement and its legacy for the generation involved and for
contemporary politics |
| Dr Aiping Mu |
University of Cambridge |
| Political agendas
and historical debates: a case study of Germany since 1945 |
| Professor Mary
Fulbrook |
University College London |
| Identities,
community relations and contemporary perceptions of slavery and the
slave trade |
| Professor Jim Walvin |
University of York |
Advertised Synopsis
"Official History" could describe the dominant view
of a country's past expressed in various public ways. A central
one of these is prescribed school history curricula, which can
affect students' world views for decades. Particular
understandings of the past also inform and justify a host of
policies in most states. It is thus no surprise that historical
debates revolve around political, ethnic and other conflicts
within a given society at least as much as around what actually
happened in the past, and play a key role in the creation and evolution
of defining national and sub-national myths. This conference will
look at issues surrounding how a democratic society forms
and changes its views about its history and, frequently therefore,
of itself, including: the impact of history education and curricula;
the effects of contending views of history on divided and post-conflict
societies; self-conscious attempts to create unifying national
historical records, such as truth and reconciliation commissions;
active inculcation of new identities, such as the teaching of
European history in a way to encourage a sense of European
citizenship; and limits on how far individuals, asserting freedom
of speech, may contradict views which have broad academic, public,
and official sanction, such as laws in various countries on Holocaust
denial. Whatever the integrity of historical scholarship, the
perception of history in the public domain is often about the
present as much as it is about the past.
Back to Top
Summary of all Conferences
2003
Fellowship Programme
Go to
2003 Conference Programme
1. Europe and the
War on Terrorism
2. Russia and the West
3. Globalization: rhetoric, reality
and international politics
Europe and the War on Terrorism
- Scotland House, Rondpoint Schumann 6, Brussels
- 21-23
February 2003
Speakers
| How
Europe can best pursue the war on terrorism |
| The
Rt Hon Chris Patten |
European Commissioner
for External Affairs |
| Electronic
surveillance and the war on terror: privacy versus security |
| Maria
Farrell |
International Chambers
of Commerce, Paris
|
| The
nature and scope of the terrorist threat |
| Dr
Magnus Ranstorp |
Centre for the Study
of Terrorism and Political Violence, University of St Andrews |
| National
policy and the European framework |
| Ria
Oonk |
Head, European Union
Division, Netherlands Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations |
Brief Description
The war on
terrorism has so far largely been shaped by the United States, but
it poses a series of specific challenges to European policy makers which
will test both the strength and the flexibility of the European Security
and Defence Policy. This seminar will explore scenarios for the
development of ESDP, examining the adapted or new forms of co-operation
which will be needed to counter a pervasive but indistinct threat, and
assessing its impact on the relationship between Europe and the United
States and on the responsibilities Europe may take on in other parts of
the world. The balance between European states and their citizens
has also been brought into question, with regard to surveillance and
privacy, and civil liberties more generally. The seminar will question
how far Europe is likely to be changed by the war on terrorism. The
Trust is grateful to the UK Foreign Office for its support of this event.
Back
to Fellowship Programme
Back to Top
Russia and the West
- Château Klingenthal, near Strasbourg
- 13-15
June 2003
Speakers
| Security
I: Russia and Europe |
| Dr
Bobo Lo |
The Royal Institute
of International Affairs, London |
| Security
II: Russia and the United States |
| Professor
Yuri Fedorov |
Deputy Director,
The Institute for Applied International Research, Moscow |
| Separatism,
human rights and the international community: a case study of Moldova |
| Oldrich
Andrysek |
UNHCR, Geneva |
| The
integration of Russia in the global economy |
| Dr
Ksenia Yudaeva |
Centre for Economic
and Financial Research, Moscow |
Brief Description
Since the
time of Peter the Great there has been a tension between the idea of
Russia as part of the West and that of Russia as a distinct entity. During
the momentous changes of the last decade, Russia has been moving towards
integration, with membership of the G8, a new relationship with NATO,
and the prospect of membership of the WTO. Until the recent conflict over
Iraq, this movement seemed to be symbolized in the close personal co-operation
between Presidents Putin and Putin. What may be the lasting effects of
the present crisis, and what new directions are likely be taken? How
will security policy develop in connection with defence reform, the relationship
with NATO, and the war on terrorism? What will be the salient issues in
connection with governance and human rights? What are the prospects for
the Russian economy and how far will these depend on an evolving relationship
with the European Union and membership of the WTO?
Back to Fellowhsip Programme
Back to Top
Globalization: rhetoric, reality and international politics
- Congress, Washington
DC
- 31
October-1 November 2003
Speakers
| Globalization and human rights |
| Mary Robinson |
Ethical Globalization
Initiative, New York; former President of Ireland, UN High Commissioner
for Human Rights |
| Who is really benefiting and who is losing from globalization?
I: The United States |
| Matthew Bishop |
World Business
Editor, The Economist |
| Who is really benefiting and who is losing from globalization?
II: The Developing World |
| Dr Ian Bremmer |
Eurasia Group |
| Dr Christian Weller |
Economic Policy
Institute, Washington DC |
| Where is economic globalization headed? The Bretton
Woods Institutions, the WTO and the fate of the Washington Consensus |
| Professor Lael Brainard |
Senior Fellow,
Brookings Institution |
Brief Description
For a number of years in
the last decade, the processes loosely labelled "globalization" were trumpeted
as an unstoppable dynamo bringing greater wealth to all, and in particular
solutions to long standing problems of poverty and underdevelopment in
many parts of the world. Now the phenomenon seems to be equally frequently
portrayed as an out-of-control juggernaut responsible for exacerbating
these problems, as well as adding to many of the world's other ills. This
conference will try to look at who really is winning and losing through
globalization, the effects of the anti-globalization movement, the fate
of the Washington consensus and its impact on international financial institutions,
and, finally, the compatibility of globalization and social justice.
Back to Fellowship
Programme
Back to
Top
|