|
2005
Fellowship Programme
2005
Conference Programme
1.
Politics and Ethnicity: communities, the state and managing changing
relationships
2.
The Battle against HIV/AIDS: thinking further ahead
1. Politics
and Ethnicity: communities, the state and managing changing
relationships
(In
Cooperation with the Trudeau
Foundation)
Neal
Ascherson's Introductory Paper
Senior
Fellow
| Neal
Ascherson |
Author and
Journalist |
Speakers
| Historical
overview: from assimilation to multi-culturalism |
| Professor
Michael Keating |
Department of
Political and Social Sciences, European University Institute |
| Showing
and Discussion of Ken Loach's film Ae
Fond Kiss? |
| Atta
Yaqub |
Youth Community
Worker in Glasgow and Lead Actor in film |
| The
balance between minority rights and individual rights: the Netherlands
as a case study |
| Tom
Kuperus |
International
Secretary, VVD (Dutch Liberal Party) |
| The
benefits and drawbacks of formal constitutional settlements: the case
of South Tyrol |
| Dr
Jens Woelk |
European Academy,
Bolzano |
| Iraq:
Communities and state-building after strife |
| Dr
Faleh Jabar |
Birkbeck College,
University of London |
| New
for old: the role of the state and other institutions in creating
identities |
| Professor
Daniel Weinstock |
University of
Montreal |
| Immigration,
solidarities and
welfare states |
| David
Goodhart |
Editor, Prospect |
| Islamic
communities and secular
states: how far should the law acknowledge religious identity? |
| Professor
Shaheen Sardar Ali |
University of
Warwick Faculty of Law |
| Global
cities and regional
hinterlands: the problematic geography of diversity |
| Professor
David Ley |
University of
British Columbia |
| Hybridity
and post-hybridity:
scenarios for the future |
| Professor
Ash Amin |
University of
Durham |
Advertised
Synopsis
Lord
Durham famously
described what would become Quebec as ‘two nations warring in
the bosom
of a single state’, a phrase which could apply in myriad
locations
worldwide. Durham’s nineteenth-century solution –
assimilation – has
been widely resisted, especially by minority communities. The problem,
however, remains and has become increasingly acute over the last 15
years in what, in some parts of the world, has been an era notorious
for ‘ethnic cleansing’. The relationship between
communities is of
prime concern now as states are reconstructed after conflict in Iraq
and Afghanistan, and as the crisis in Darfur has unfolded. The
relationship between the state and diverse communities is also under
renewed scrutiny in many parts of the West. Even in countries such as
the Netherlands, so long renowned for its liberal consensus, the
political ground has been shifting on this issue. There is therefore
renewed urgency in questioning how to balance the rights of diverse
minority and majority religious and ethnic groups (nations, so to
speak) within a state, in a world where the nation-state is still a
fictive norm in and around which institutions are built. What are the
problems and strengths inherent in the concept of minority rights as
distinct from individual rights? When is multi-culturalism the best
approach? Or how far are its critics right that it tends to
institutionalize, or even increase existing divisions, and give power
within communities to leaders who are not necessarily representative?
Through case studies, the conference will consider different strategies
– both of the state and of groups – as to claims on
state attention and
resources, and the impact of these on the country as a whole. This
latter question is complicated in many states by a growing split
between cosmopolitan urban areas and more mono-cultural rural ones,
with even the possibility of the ‘horizontal’
territory, the nation
state, losing out to ‘vertical’ conurbations,
increasingly autonomous
cities. Finally, the conference will assess the significance of
hybridity - newly developing cultural syntheses, accepting neither the
‘one-way street’ of assimilation into a majority
culture nor the
boundaries of multi-culturalism - and the set of issues which it in
turn may bring to the fore.
Back
to Top
2. The Battle against HIV/AIDS:
thinking further ahead
(In
Cooperation with Cumberland
Lodge)
Shereen El
Feki's Introductory Paper
Senior
Fellows
| Dr Shereen El
Feki |
Healthcare Correspondent, The Economist |
Robin
Gorna
|
HIV/AIDS Team Leader, DFID
|
Speakers
| What we
are facing: the current
state of the epidemic and how it is likely to develop in the coming
decade |
| Dr Catherine
Hankins |
Chief Scientific Adviser and Associate Director,
Strategic Information, UNAIDS |
Where
are the crucial weaknesses
in healthcare infrastructure in addressing the problem? Is an
appropriate
balance being struck between prevention and treatment? |
| Dr Daraus Bukenya |
HIV/AIDS/TB Program Leader for the African
Medical and
Research Foundation (AMREF), Nairobi |
| Iona
Joy (Discussant) |
New Philanthropy Capital, London
|
| Is
policy-making appropriately
dealing with issues of gender and the vulnerability of women to
HIV/AIDS? |
| Judith Bruce |
Director, Gender, Family and Development, the
Population Council |
Dr
Naomi Rutenberg
|
Deputy Director of the Population Council's
Horizons
Program on HIV
|
| Business
and HIV/AIDS |
| Kirsty Jenkinson |
F&C Asset Management |
| Governance
I: What are the most
significant political and cultural impediments to progress, and how
might they be overcome? |
| Uwe Wissenbach |
responsible for Health, AIDS and Population
issues,
Directorate General for Development, European Commission |
| AIDS
exceptionalism: costs and
benefits |
| Dr Christine
Kirunga Tashobya |
Health Advisor, Ugandan Ministry of Health |
| Governance
II: What emerging
threats does HIV/AIDS pose for the security of states and of societies
in different parts of the world? |
| George Fidas |
Elliott School of International Affairs, The
George
Washington University |
| What
can faith communities
achieve, or must differing moral vantage points inevitably lead to
distraction from fighting the virus? |
| James Cairns |
World Conference of Religions for Peace |
| How
might civil society and
business at the grassroots be more effectively mobilized? |
| Zackie Achmat |
Chairman, Treatment Action Campaign, South Africa |
| UNAIDS
Scenarios: in the light
of these, what policies may be sustainable through to 2025? |
| Dapo Oyewole |
Executive Director, Centre for African Policy
&
Peace Strategy (CAPPS), London
|
Advertised
Synopsis
Despite
a
huge increase in the resources deployed against HIV/AIDS recently,
controversy still rages about almost every aspect of this battle. This
conference will examine the obstacles to effective action and explore
sustainable strategies to over-come them. What are the lessons from the
crisis in sub-Saharan Africa and are they being communicated there and
to areas where the epidemic is at an earlier stage? Governance, both
international and national, is of central importance. Within states how
can administrative failures or complacency be addressed, without
foreign support being viewed as interference or even shadow
imperialism? Where are the crucial weaknesses in healthcare
infrastructure, and are more integrated approaches redressing these?
Money is key, but so is how it is raised or deployed. Could donors be
more effectively coordinated? Will the proposed International Finance
Facility alter the funding landscape, and could other initiatives be
encouraged? Religious beliefs, culture and social norms play a major
role in addressing human sexuality. What can faith communities achieve,
or must differing moral vantage points inevitably lead to distraction
from fighting the virus? How might civil society and business be more
effectively mobilized? Despite advances, is policy-making appropriately
dealing with issues of gender and the vulnerability of women to
HIV/AIDS? As to treatment, what are the limits of generic drugs? Where
can or should long-term resources be deployed to enable science and
technology to speed up work? But is there an opportunity cost in
boosting spending on HIV/AIDS, particularly with respect to other
diseases or the entire healthcare system, and what is the appropriate
place for HIV/AIDS on the development agenda? Finally, are our horizons
too short term to address what will be sustainable in this battle
through to 2015 and 2025?
Back
to Top
Summary
of all
Conferences
2005
Fellowship Programme
Go to 2005
Conference
Programme
Where
is Europe headed?
(with the generous sponsorship of Commerzbank)
- Commerzbank
Tower, Frankfurt
- 24
March 2005
| The
Challenges Facing European Business and the Economy |
| Ulrich
Ramm |
Executive
Vice-President, Commerzbank |
| Matthew
Bishop |
World Business
Editor,
The Economist
|
Prospects
for the European Constitution
|
| Patrice
de Beer |
Editor-in-Chief, Le
Monde |
Europe’s
International Role in the decades ahead
|
| Robert
Cooper |
Director-General
for External and Politico-Military Affairs, European Union |
Where
next for Europe: Views from the New Entrants
|
| Ivo
Silhavy |
Czech Ministry of
Foreign Affairs |
Pawel
Swieboda
|
Head of EU
Department, Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
|
Unfinished
Business: How far will enlargement go?
|
| Rt
Hon Lord Patten of Barnes |
Chairman, 21st
Century Trust |
Klaus-Peter
Müller (Chairing)
|
Chairman of the
Board, Commerzbank |
Brief
Description
The
European Union has recently passed a major milestone with the
entry of ten new Member States. While consolidating related
changes,
and planning for the eventual entry of a number of states from South
Eastern Europe, it is appropriate to consider what is next for the
Union
and Europe as a whole. Is the constitution likely to succeed
and, if not,
what is the likely shape of domestic arrangements and power
relationships within the EU? Will the Union develop a more
unified
international voice, including a truly common foreign and security
policy,
or will national interests continue to dominate in this sphere? How
will
relations develop with major international players, in particular the
United States? Where will expansion finally stop, and will Turkey
become a full member of the club? What new projects might be
on the
horizon, or has the Union grown too big to do much more than maintain
its current condition? In short, where next for Europe?
The Trust would like to express its gratitude to Commerzbank and its
Chairman Klaus-Peter Muller for hosting this event at Commerzbank
headquarters.
Back
to
Fellowship
Programme
Back
to
Top
Taming the Wind?: Science,
Policy and Public Perceptions in an Era of Rapid Innovation
(in cooperation with the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the
Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft WissenschaftsForum,
Berlin
- 21-23 April 2005
Brief
Description
In various sciences, information technology and genetics to name but
two, the pace of innovation and discovery over the last decade have
been immense. Such advances are laden with the possibility of
great benefit. They pose dilemmas, however, for policy
makers. The latter must, as representatives of a
state’s
citizenry, respond to unease in parts of the population over possible
moral implications of such research – such as those
underlying debates
over stem cell debate or genetically-modified foods. Even
where
there is general approval of these developments, regulatory structures
often require substantial adjustment, such as those the Internet has
forced on communications and broadcasting regimes around the
world. The biggest complication, however, is that the speed
of
scientific advance often outstrips the ability of government to
adjust. They thus run the risk of either regulating
technologies
and practices which have become obsolete, or trying to create policy
for developments whose arrival they can predict only
unclearly.
This round-table conference is designed to bring together leading
thinkers in the field from a variety of perspectives, including that of
the rising generation, to assess the strengths and weaknesses of
science policy today. It is intended that this conference
will
then be a seed bed of ideas for a series of four further conferences on
science policy and the links between scientific research and society at
large and the establishment of a network of younger leaders.
Back to
Fellowship Programme
Back
to
Top
3. Iraq, Insurgency, and the Prospects for Peace in the Greater Middle East
- Château
Klingenthal, near Strasbourg
- 10 - 12 June 2005
| Scenarios for the outcome of state-building in Iraq and their strategic implications |
| Dr Graeme Herd |
George C Marshall Center for Security Studies |
| Iraq and the Israel-Palestine Conflict |
| Professor Avi Shlaim |
St Antony’s College, Oxford |
| What future for Saudi Arabia? |
| Dr Mai Yamani |
Royal Institute for International Affairs, London |
| The US and the ethics of the war against terrorism |
| Professor Christopher Coker |
London School of Economics |
Brief
Description
The Iraq war and its aftermath have been among the most controversial
topics of recent history, with complex repercussions in the Middle East
and beyond. This conference will consider future prospects for
Iraq itself, along with an assessment of how events there might affect,
and be
affected by, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, developments in Iran and Saudi Arabia, and the US war on terrorism.
Back
to
Fellowship Programme
Back
to top
|